The 4060-Ti is more power efficient (quieter), has a broader feature set (RT/DLSS 3.0) and offers far better game compatibility (drivers). First time buyers tempted to consider the RX 7600/6800 by AMD’s army of Advanced Marketing scammers (youtube, reddit, twitter, forums etc.) should be aware that AMD have a history of releasing benchmark busting, heavily marketed, sub standard products. The 8 GB variant is easily the better option as games rarely use more than 8 GB. This will not concern most gamers, who are best off playing at 1080p. Since the 4060-Ti only has 128-bit memory (vs 256-bit in the 3060-Ti) it is only around (6%) faster than the 3060-Ti at 4K. The 4060-Ti is around 12% faster than the 3060-Ti at the same MSRP and offers similar performance to the 3070 at a 20% lower MSRP. It features 4,352 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.5 GHz, 8 GB or 16 GB of memory, a 128-bit memory bus, 34 3rd gen RT cores, 136 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 160W and launch prices of $400 USD (8 GB) and $500 USD (16 GB). Feb 13th, 2024 G.The RTX 4060-Ti is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture.Feb 26th, 2024 Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 GRE Pulse Review.Feb 15th, 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB Review - The Fastest Slot-Powered GPU.Feb 20th, 2024 Arctic Liquid Freezer III 240 Black Review - Intel Contact Frame Included.Feb 12th, 2024 Upcoming Hardware Launches 2023 (Updated Feb 2024).Feb 22nd, 2024 Sparkle Arc A380 Genie Review.Feb 13th, 2024 Chat with NVIDIA RTX Tech Demo Review.The similarities the GTX 770 bears to the GTX 680 are in that sense more along the lines of those between the GeForce 8800 GTS-512 and GeForce 9800 GTX. Sure, it is driven by the same GK104 silicon with the same exact core configuration of 1536 cores, 128 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 256-bit wide memory interface but it features a different reference-design PCB that comes with a stronger VRM to support higher clock speeds, and the new GPU Boost 2.0 technology. To be fair to NVIDIA, the GeForce GTX 770 isn't a complete and utter rebranding of the GeForce GTX 680 (à la GeForce 8800 GT to 9800 GT). The GTX 770 is priced roughly on par with the GTX 680, and other models in the series could feature similar pricing trends. I call this card a pseudo-upgrade because its specification increases don't come at the same price. The GeForce GTX 770 looks a lot like the GeForce GTX 680 on paper, and it is rumored that the GeForce GTX 760 Ti could bear a similar resemblance to the GeForce GTX 670, the GTX 760 to the GTX 660 Ti, and so on. The rest of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 700 series product stack is in for a pseudo-upgrade. It made its consumer debut with only 2688 enabled cores on the GeForce GTX TITAN, and warranted a $1000 price point, which went on to make the $6-core GeForce GTX 780 commanded look good. With GK104 beating AMD's "Tahiti" in single-GPU performance and efficiency, the GK110 never had to feature in the GeForce GTX 600 series. The 2880-core GK110 was always going to be the most flexible chip for NVIDIA. The GeForce GTX 770 we have with us today is the first of many such products in NVIDIA's pipeline over the next few months. After NVIDIA scored a big technological victory over AMD in terms of performance-per-watt and pure performance with its "Kepler" GPU architecture, and AMD's rather lukewarm response to the GeForce GTX 600 series coupled with the company's intention not to launch its next GPU generation until much later this year (think X'mas), it was only natural of NVIDIA to milk its existing GK104 silicon for another generation of GeForce GTX products, with a few superficial additions.